Facing an attack over the economic situation amid a sliding rupee, Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh, made a detailed statement on the crisis in Rajya Sabha, asserting that growth will improve in the second half of fiscal year, even as the BJP and Left parties walked out after his statement.
What triggered the sharp depreciation in Rupee value was due to certain external forces
We need to reduce our appetite for gold, economise the use of petroleum products and take steps to increase our exports
The last two decades have seen India grow as an open economy and benefited from it. There is no question of reversing these policies
Growth will pick up in second half of fiscal year
US federal reserves tapering has caused general weakening in global currencies
Part of rupee depreciation needed adjustment as inflation in India was much higher than advanced countries
Government not contemplating capital controls
Foreign exchange reserves at USD 278 bn more than sufficient to meet requirement
Depreciation of rupee and rise in oil prices will put further upward pressure on inflation
Teken de petitie en lees het laatste campagnenieuws.
Stop gedwongen verdwijningen Syrië
Het verschrikkelijke drama in Syrië duurt voort, met een vermoedelijke gifgasaanval als nieuw dieptepunt. Amnesty blijft aandringen op onpartijdig onderzoek naar deze en andere mensenrechtenschendingen. Wat is er bijvoorbeeld gebeurd met de duizenden vermeende tegenstanders van de regering die zonder aanwijsbare reden zijn gearresteerd? Velen van hen zijn nog steeds vermist. Hun families weten niet waar ze zijn. Vandaag is het de Internationale Dag van de Slachtoffers van Gedwongen Verdwijning. Kom in actie!
Amnesty heeft afgelopen zomer volop actie gevoerd voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting in Rusland. Dat gebeurde onder meer op de verschillende festivals (Pinkpop, Lowlands, de Zwarte Cross en de Canal Pride).
Klik hier voor een overzicht van onze activiteiten.
Help Amnesty de Charity Award te winnen
Met deze advertentie voor de Rusland-campagne is Amnesty genomineerd voor de NRC Charity Awards 2013. Lezers en een vakjury bepalen welk goed doel de beste dagbladadvertentie publiceerde. Amnesty is al geselecteerd voor de vakjuryprijs, maar voor de publieksprijs hebben wij jouw stem nodig! Wil jij ons helpen de prijs binnen te slepen? Breng hier je stem uit.
Je nieuwe rekeningnummer: IBAN De komende periode gaat iedereen in Nederland over op een nieuw bankrekeningnummer: het International Bank Account Number (IBAN). Per 1 februari 2014 vervallen de huidige rekeningnummers. Steun je Amnesty met een automatische incasso, dan verandert er niets. Je betaling gaat gewoon door. Steun je ons met een acceptgiro, let dan op: acceptgiro’s van Amnesty die je vóór 1 september 2013 hebt ontvangen, kun je na 1 februari 2014 niet meer gebruiken om je gift of lidmaatschapsbijdrage over te maken. Amnesty stuurt vanaf nu alleen nog maar IBAN-acceptgiro’s. Lees hier meer.
Postbus 1968 – 1000 BZ – Amsterdam
Je ontvangt deze ´Kom in actie!-mailing´ omdat je lid bent van Amnesty, je actief voor ons inzet of hebt aangegeven op de hoogte te willen worden gehouden van Amnesty´s campagnes en acties. Wil je deze mailings liever niet ontvangen? Dan kun je je hieronder afmelden.
THE LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION (SHRI ARUN JAITLEY): You are setting a wrong precedent and I will tell you the reason why. This is a Motion for filling up two vacancies in the JPC. Now, it is a JPC on 2G Spectrum Allocation. For the last few months, the Committee has not been functioning. Numbers matter; they are important, considering what is happening. From time immemorial, a Parliamentary Committee always represents the strength of various parties in the House. It is proportionate; it is never ‘winner takes all’. Otherwise, if a Resolution system is there, when a Committee is constituted, the Government, which may be in a majority, will say, ‘I propose a Resolution and all Members are mine.’ It has never happened. Now, you have, like a bye-election, two casual vacancies, and two casual vacancies have arisen. Now, two casual vacancies, therefore, have to be filled up in a manner, keeping the proportionate strength of the Government and the Opposition in mind. It can’t be that the Government proposes and takes both. That is against parliamentary norms and the precedent that they are setting is extremely dangerous, which would be far-reaching, and for future parliamentary history, it would have bad consequences. Therefore, the Minister must discuss this with important Members of the Opposition and if we can give an agreed name to him, have a proportionate representation, which is the in-built parliamentary rule. …(Interruptions)…
SHRI SITARAM YECHURY: Sir, I would suggest, let the hon. Minister call a meeting of all the leaders. Let us all sit down and discuss it and, then, come to an agreement on that. Don’t push through something. You just call all of us — we are all here– and then decide.
SHRI RAJEEV SHUKLA: Mr. Deputy Chairman, Sir, we have discussed this with leaders of different political parties. It is not as if a Congress Party nominee’s name, or a UPA nominee’s name is being given in place of Mr. Siva. There are ten MPs nominated by the President of India. This time, we are giving one nomination to a person who has been nominated by the President of India. That block is there. …(Interruptions)…
SHRI BALBIR PUNJ: It is at your…(Interruptions)…
SHRI RAJEEV SHUKLA: That block is there. And, most of the people have agreed on that. So, if the House has to decide it, it should be left to the House. And we are ready for a division.
SHRI ARUN JAITLEY: That is exactly my opposition. It is not that you are nominating a Nominated Member.
SHRI RAJEEV SHUKLA: Ultimately, the House is supreme. Let the House decide.
SHRI ARUN JAITLEY: Both the Members that you are nominating are Members of choice of the Government. Therefore, if the Government says, ‘by an absolute majority we can take both’, then, in future Parliamentary Committees, there could be a precedent of no Opposition representation and the winner taking it all.
SHRI RAJEEV SHUKLA: There may be many other precedents also. Therefore, I am suggesting, let the House decide.
SHRI ARUN JAITLEY: That is the precedent you would be setting. Therefore, let the Chairman discuss this. It is a precedent which is going to have very dangerous consequences, where if there are two vacancies, Government takes both, because irrespective of who the Member is, both Members are of your choice. The Opposition’s views are not taken into consideration. We are willing to request any one Member from the Opposition. Let Mr. Yechury and Dr. Maitreyan be there; we would ask Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad to be there; you discuss it with all the three of them and settle the matter.
SHRI RAJEEV SHUKLA: But I think the House is supreme, and let the House decide. …(Interruptions)… the House should decide it. Discussions will keep on taking place. The other day also, no discussion took place. Let the House take a decision. The House is supreme, and I am ready for a division. …(Interruptions)…
SHRI ARUN JAITLEY: So, are you saying that this House would, henceforth, decide? Let us be very clear. Is it the Government’s stand and, therefore, the stand of the ruling party, that in future when Parliamentary Committees are constituted, it would be done by a principle of ‘winner takes all’, and there would be no Opposition representative?
On behalf of the Members of Parliament of the Bharatiya Janata Party we submit this Memorandum to you on the unprecedented crisis facing the Indian economy today. The free fall of the Indian rupee against the US dollar is only a symptom of the deeper malaise afflicting the Indian economy today. The fundamentals of the Indian economy have been ruined because of the reckless policies of the government. The Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act was thrown out of the window in 2008-09. The fiscal deficit of the government was allowed to rise exponentially in that year by the then Finance Minister who also happens to be the Finance Minister today from 2.5% of the GDP in 2007-08 to 6 percent of the GDP and the revenue deficit from 1.1 percent to 4.5 percent. This splurge in expenditure in 2008-09, most of which was consumption expenditure and not investment expenditure is wholly responsible for the present crisis. Fiscal deficit and revenue deficit have stayed at unsustainable levels year after year since then. The utter carelessness displayed on the external front has led to a burgeoning current account deficit. Retail inflation has been in double digit for the last four years. Interest rates have increased to unacceptable levels leading to a singular decline in investment. This has affected production adversely as a result of which growth rate in 2012-13 has declined to 5%. Experts predict that the growth rate in the current year may be below 4 percent.
The foreign exchange market and the stock markets have become extremely volatile. The rupee has lost as much as 3 percent against the dollar in a single day. An atmosphere of gloom and doom prevails in the country. We shudder to think of the unbearable consequences all these developments are going to have on the common man. There is already a talk of diesel prices going up by Rs. five a litre after the current Parliament session ends.
The Government of India, as usual, is in denial. Not satisfied with this it blames everybody else for the current crisis except itself. It blames the opposition, the state governments, the Reserve Bank of India and the global factors. The limit of irresponsibility was however crossed when the Finance Minister blamed his immediate predecessor for the crisis and the Prime Minister kept quiet. Sir, the crisis which afflicts the economy and the country today is primarily a crisis of confidence. We have a government which is unable to take any decision, provide any leadership, or a ray of hope for the future. It is mired in humongous corruption. Even the Supreme Court now suspects that it is trying to destroy evidence by making the incriminating files go missing.
The country can ill-afford at this moment of crisis a government which is paralysed, a Prime Minister who never speaks, a Finance Minister who wrongly blames his immediate predecessor who is unable to defend himself, a supreme leader who does not care about where the money will come from and a bureaucracy which is frozen and unable to act. The Ministers of this government are unbridled and working at cross-purposes. The relationship of the Government of India with the State Governments, specially the non-UPA ruled states and with the opposition parties, is at its nadir. We have come to urge you, therefore, to end the prevailing uncertainty by advising this Government to seek a fresh mandate at the earliest and not later than the state elections due in the next three months.
Instituto Cervantes brings to the Delhi Photo Festival some of the best photographers from Spain and Latin-America
Instituto Cervantes will bring two major exhibition by four masters of the Latin-American photography, The Vargas brothers and the Cifuentes father and son, a digital exhibition of works by some of the most important contemporary Spanish Photographers, such as García-Alix, Madoz or Ballester, and a film about photojournalism which includes unedited photos of great masters: Capa, Taro and Seymour.
Exhibition “The eye of the father and son: The photography of Hugo and Diego Cifuentes” (Thursday 26thSeptember – Sunday 24th November)
Exhibition “Nocturnal”, by the Vargas brothers (Thursday 26th September – Sunday 24th November)
Digital exhibition of Contemporary Spanish photography (Saturday 28th September)
Film Screening of “The Mexican Suitcase” (Sunday 29th September)
Two exhibitions of four major internationally recognised Latinamerican photographers will be shown at Instituto Cervantes, from Thursday 26th September till Sunday 24th November: the Vargas brothers and the Cifuentes father and son.
The exhibition “The eye of the father and the son: The photography of Hugo and Diego Cifuentes” will show the artwork of the ‘father of Ecuadorian contemporary Photography’ (Hugo Cifuentes), and one of the “Latin American Leaders for the New Millenium” nominated by TIME magazine, his son Diego.
In spite of being close relatives, they differed on some aspects regarded their pictures. “Though we both deal with the same universe, our visions and styles are very different”, explained the son, Diego Cifuentes, who added that his father was closed to the magic realism but “I try to have a more intense proximity to my sorrows and my demons”.
“Nocturnal”, by the Vargas brothers will show the work of these two Peruvians who caught the night life of the American country in the beginning of the 20th century. Despite their different personalities, their work complements each other perfectly: one was the technical expert and the other, the artist point of view.
They were said to be Arequipa’s (the town where they were born) spirit. “First it was the lens of the Vargas brothers, then a landscape was set up and finally, Arequipa was founded”, published the Latin newspaper El Pueblo about these brothers.
Instituto Cervantes also will display a digital exhibition of major Spanish contemporary photographers, in collaboration to the museum “Patio Herreriano” of Spanish Contemporary Art in Valladolid. The show will include photos by Alberto García-Alix, most of them based in the Madrid’s night life, or Chema Madoz’s work that shows his surrealistic world through common objects.
Furthermore, the Spanish exhibition will include the lens of: José Manuel Ballester, who is very interested in the architecture; Ángel Marcos, whose pictures have an important influence of advertising; and Concha Pérez, focused in uninhabited and ruin urban spaces.
The story of a suitcase which remained lost for tens of years but contained 4.500 unique negatives from Robert Capa, Gerda Taro and David “Chim” Seymour is the plot of the film “The Mexican suitcase”, that is going to be projected at Instituto Cervantes Auditorium on Sunday 29th September.
The photography plays the main character in this film which is, at the same time, a documentary about the Spanish Civil war and about the journalists who fought the European fascism with their cameras.
However, that is not the unique Latin-American and Spanish presence in the festival. The curators of the Festival have also chosen the pictures of a new generation of photographers from Spain, Argentina, Nicaragua and Perú. Works of Spanish photographers like Alvaro Láiz (ANHUA), David Rengel (ANHUA) and Albert Bosnfills, the Argentineans Flavia Schuster, Martín Javier Estol and Sofía López Mañan and also works from Nicaragua and Perú, respectively, Mayerling García and Max Cabello Orcasitas were selected by the Delhi Photo Festival’s curators.
Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011
The Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011 is was tabled in parliament today and came up for discussion in Lok Sabha. There has not been any consensus on the Bill yet the UPA government is bringing the Bill. In some cases the new Bill is worse than the colonial 1894 Act, by expanding the definition of public purpose, legitimising the acquisition for private corporations and excluding all other laws used for land acquisition for highways, industrial corridors and others.
The proposed amendments introduced by the Ministry of Rural Development earlier this year was to further take away the rights of the people in planning process and the principle of prior informed consent.
The Bill in its current form has refused to accept the key recommendations of the Parliamentary Standing Committee, something which Chairperson fails to see but, a concern shared by many other members of the Committee.
The Bill has now been renamed “Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, with a claim to better reflect Government’s Commitment towards securing a legal guarantee for the rights of project affected, and ensuring greater transparency in the land acquisition process. It is also claimed that the Bill will ensure, in concert with local institutions of self-government and Gram Sabhas established under the Constitution, a humane, participative, informed, consultative and transparent process for land acquisition.
However, we feel that the Parliament should not pass the proposed Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill, in its current form. It needs to be democratically debated by all and take those in account, rather than succumb to the private corporations interests and pursue undemocratic growth. Until then put a moratorium on all ongoing land acquisitions in the country. We oppose all such undemocratic, attempts legislative or otherwise.
In public domain we have the Parliamentary Standing Committee’s report (on Rural Development) on the Bill as well as the amendments introduced by the Ministry of Rural Development, we, the people’s movements, have taken serious cognizance of the fact that the strong position taken by the Standing Committee on certain critical issues are either diluted or rejected by the Ministry of Rural Development, which is shocking. The Ministry that is supposed to protect the rights and powers of the rural communities has not accepted some of the standing committee recommendations, towards that end, which are presented with our comments, herewith:
Definition of Public Purpose and Infrastructure
The Committee had suggested a restrictive definition of Public Purpose, something which didn’t leave any discretionary power to the government and also development of infrastructure by the public agencies with the public funds only.
Ministry has proposed an expansive definition of public purpose and infrastructure and also a clause which leaves the discretionary power to declare anything as infrastructure and of public purpose. The Committee to decide upon the nature of the public purpose all consists of bureaucrats and representation of the democratically elected local self government institutions is wanting. Gram Sabha and Basti Sabha in consonance with the Art 243 provisions have every right to the planning and hence the power to decide the nature of public purpose must rest with them, which will also democratise the development planning.
It is ironical that while food processing and other agriculture related secondary and tertiary sector industries have been brought in the public purpose definition but agriculture itself has not been considered a public purpose, something which would have meant no acquisition of agricultural land.
Acquisition for Private and PPP Projects
No forcible acquisition for private projects, or for PPP, which can not to be categorized as public purpose projects.
l Ministry has rejected this and justified this with a provision that consent of 80% of project affected People will be sought before acquisition for any private projects
In this era of neo-liberal economic reforms, private projects with corporate investment and interests are taking a much larger toll of land and other rich natural resources as also uprooting by killing communities which are generations old. This must come to an end and the same can happen only with stopping the State playing a role of facilitator and land dealer. At the cost of the livelihood of the nature based sections and working class section of society, the state can’t transfer the most valuable livelihood resources such as land, water to the profiteering bodies in the garb of ‘public interest‘ and ‘public purpose‘.
Food Security and Agricultural Land Acquisition
No forcible acquisition of agricultural land, for non-agricultural purpose including single crop and multi crop land.
l The proposed Bill leaves this to the state governments to decide, rather than take a clear stand on it. It makes provisions for acquisition of common property resources too.
How can the in-between farms that may be unirrigated, rain fed, single crop be left out, we ask. India has 75% of the agricultural land as rain fed and most of it single cropped. Such land is mostly held by Dalits, Adivasis and marginal farms. Protecting them and all farm land for food security, which comes not from PDS but self sufficient agriculture, is a must!
Bringing 16 Central Acts Under Purview of this Bill
The standing committee has recommended that all 16 central acts should be brought under the purview of the new act, to make all equal before law (Article 14 of the Constitution).
l Ministry of Rural Development wants to exclude 13 out of 16 Acts including Industrial Development Act, Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, National Highways Act and others from the purview of the new act. This means that 90% of the land acquired as on today will continue with injustice and force used, with no change at all.
The standing committee recommendations must be upheld to end brutal unjust acquisition for all projects under various state and central laws.
Role and Consent of Gram and Basti Sabha
The Committee asks that all studies – SIA, EIA, expert committee appraisal be done in consultation with the gram sabhas and the corresponding reports be made available to the gram sabhas.
l Ministry emphasises that 80% consent of land loosers is there in case of acquisition for private sector projects and 70% for public private partnership projects.
Consent and direct involvement of majority of the Gram Sabhas must be there in each and every project, including public projects for public purpose. 80% and 70% consent of the land losers for the private and public – private projects, respectively, alone is not sufficient. Also, why should the linear projects be left out? If it’s consent of 80% affected, there are to be a number of manipulations that people will have to face. Experiences of 70% consent in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme in Mumbai are quite telling.
Return of Unutilised Land to farmers and Land Bank
The Committee recommended that the land, if not used till 5 years, should be returned after 5 years from the date of possession to the land owners.
l Ministry accepts the reduced five years time period and also its return to the landowner or its legal heirs but retains the provisions for State Land Bank.
The ownership over the land is of those who till it and if not used and unutilized then it must be returned to the owners or distributed amongst the project affected people. We oppose any such feature which will promote land bank, since it has promoted large scale acquisition in the past and later illegally transferred the same land to corporations for real estate and other purposes.
Retrospective Application of the Law and Repeal of Land Acquisition Act
On the question of retrospective application of the R&R provisions Committee has suggested to Ministry to re-examine the issue and incorporate necessary provisions
l Ministry has partially brought in the retrospective application of the R&R provisions of the Bill in cases where the award under Section 11 of the LAA 1894, has not been made or where award has been made but the possession not taken.
It needs to be noted that nearly 100 million people have been displaced since independence and with a dismal 17-20 percent rate of resettlement and rehabilitation we had suggested that not only the retrospective application of the provisions of the new act but a National Resettlement and Rehabilitation Commission be established to deal with the claims of the projected affected people from various projects. Also the Land Acquisition Act 1894 need to be repealed completely, two acts dealing with the land acquisition will bring in legal challenges and also negate the whole purpose of bringing in a new legislation.
Resettlement and Rehabilitation Benefits
In terms of the resettlement and rehabilitation benefits Committee apart from suggesting some cosmetic changes have accepted the provisions of the Bill, we think this is unfortunate since provisions don’t stand up to livelihood based R&R, it merely promotes the principle of cash compensation. It will be a retrogressive step since it negates the land and employment based R&R as mandated in the Narmada Water Dispute Tribunal Award, and various other projects. The proposed provisions of compensating employment with money and high rates for land acquired will only lead to speculative land market and will destroy the fragile economy of the rural hinterland which will lead to further urban migration.
The Bill and the comments by both, Standing Committee as well as MoRD almost totally excludes and have unaddressed the situation in the urban areas, where there is no land acquisition, but eviction, brutal and unjust, for any and every elitist real estate development to infrastructure without guaranteeing right to shelter, right to life and livelihood. The only provision is to compensate with 20% of developed land for land owning families in urbanisation projects, which is not with regard to the cases where land belongs to the government or private entities but people are evicted. We demand a separate section or a separate act for the millions of the urban persons and urban land from getting misappropriated. The Bill with the presently proposed content need to be called only “Rural Bill”.
The rapacious use of Land Acquisition Act 1894 by the government to secure land for ‘development’ projects has caused over 100 million people to be displaced from their land, livelihoods and shelters. The country is dotted with communities resisting State sponsored land grab which resonate the demand for a just law to ensure that there is no forced acquisition of land and resources, including minerals and ground water. The government must respond to the voices from movements across places such as Narmada, Koel Karo, Singur, Nandigram, Sonbhadra, Chindwara, Bhavnagarm, Kalinga Nagar, Kashipur, Raigarh, Srikakulam and mining areas in central India with genuine efforts to address the longstanding crisis concerning land Acquisition and resettlement & rehabilitation.
If the UPA government is serious about addressing the conflicts over the land and other natural resources then it must listen to the voices of those struggling or else it will only aggravate these conflicts all across the country. The need of growth, infrastructure and urbanisation can’t be fulfilled on the graveyard of millions. A pro-people Development Planning Bill with complete participation of the Gram Sabha will go a long way in stopping the massive corporate corruption and lead to decentralization of power having an overall impact on the politics of the country.
The New LARR Bill will not End the British Legacy of Forced Land Acquisition
People’s Consent for Every Development Project is a MUST
All Agricultural Land Should be Protected from Acquisition and Diversion
Gangtey Monastery:Situated atop a hill at an altitude of 2800m, Gangtey Monastery (also known as Gangtey Sanga Choeling Goemba) offers a stunning view of Phobjikha valley, winter home to the rare Black Necked Cranes. This
venerable monastery was founded in 1613 by Je Kuenga Gyaltshen but can trace its history to the famousTerton(Buddhist treasure revealier) Pema Lingpa. In the 15th century Terton Pema Lingpa was visiting Phobjhikha valley and foretold that one day his descendents would build a monastery atop the mountains of the region.
The monastery complex consists of five buildings surrounding the main central tower or Utse
Dargay Goempa: This monastery was built in the spot where Divine Madman Drukpa Kuenley first met Ashi Genzo who was renowned for her beauty. When it was first constructed the
monastery was a simple Drubdey or meditation center. Lam Drukpa Kuenley is widely considered to be Bhutan’s favourite and most iconic saint due to his unorthodox method of teaching through ribald humor.
DID YOU KNOW?
With an abundance of rare and exotic flora and fauna, Bhutan is one of the last biodiversity hotspots in the world.
In order to preserve our rich natural heritage, it has been mandated in our constitution that at minimum 60% of the country’s total area is protected. Currently 72% of the area is under pristine forest cover.Learn More at: http://www.tourism.gov.bt/about-bhutan/flora-fauna
WHAT TO DO
Black Necked Crane Festival: This annual festival takes place inPhobjhikha valley (3000m), an alpine wetland that acts as the most important wintering ground for the Black Necked Cranes that migrate through the kingdom each year.
The festival includes folk songs and dances, mask dances and environmentally themed plays and songs performed by local school children.
The festival also offers opportunities for hiking or to visit the local temple, Gangtey Monastery. It not only give visitors a chance to see this majestic bird in its natural habitat but also educates people on the importance of protecting the natural environment while providing financial benefits to the locals.
The Gangtey trek is short, easy three-day trek that winds through beautiful forests of Juniper, Bamboo and Rhododendron.
It is an excellent trek for beginner and veteran trekkers alike as it covers gentle slopes while still offering gorgeous views of the pristine, forested landscape. Another attractive feature of the trail is that it passes through several quaint villages and local monasteries.Learn More at: http://www.tourism.gov.bt/trek/gangtey-trek
UPCOMING EVENTS IN BHUTAN
Thimphu Domchoe: The annual Thimphu Domchoeis considered to be one of the most special and sacred religious festivals in the country. Families come from all over to attend the Domchoe as it
is popularly believed that viewing the Domchoe will bestow you with merit, luck and cleanse your sins.
The highlight of the festival is the Lhamoi Tshomi Kunchum Dance which is performed in honour of Pelden Lhamo, one of the main protective deities of the kingdom.
The Domchoe was first instituted in the 1700’s by Gyalse Kuenga Gyeltshen, the reincarnation of Jamphel Dorji, the son of Zhabdrung Ngawang Namgyal.
For further information, please contact:
Tourism Council of Bhutan, India Representative Office C/o Charson Advisory Services Pvt. Ltd. 1104 Arcadia, 11th Floor, NCPA Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400021 – India Tel: 91 (22) 65172273; Fax: 91 (22) 22828835; Email: email@example.comTourism Council of Bhutan Tarayana Centre, Chubachu, Thimphu, Bhutan Tel: 975 2 323251/2 ; Email: firstname.lastname@example.org; Web: www.tourism.gov.bt
C.R.P.F School, Rohini Thrash Agnel Public School, Noida to Reach Semis
G.D. Goenka Public School, Rohini; Apeejay Public School, Noida and D.P.S., Vasant Kunj Qualify for Semi-finals
New Delhi, 29th August: C.R.P.F School, Rohini; G.D. Goenka Public School, Rohini; Apeejay School, Noida and Delhi Public School, Vasant Kunj entered the semi-final of the 2nd edition of the Airtel Rising Stars-Delhi Leg, held at Ambedkar Stadium in Delhi today.
Abhishek Yadav’s brace helped C.R.P.F. Public School, Rohini thrash Agnel Public School, Noida 4-0 in an exciting quarter-final match.
C.R.P.F School started to build pressure from the beginning as Mohd. Aqib scored the first goal in 5th minute and gave an early lead to his team. Abhishek Yadav extended the lead by scoring a brace at 8th and 44th minute. Mukesh’s goal at 48th minute sealed the victory against Agnel Public School, Noida.
In another quarter-final match at the same ground, D.P.S., Vasant Kunj drubbed N. K. Bargodia Public School, Rohini 3-0. Vatsal from D.P.S, Vasant Kunj was the star of the match as he scored a brace at 2nd and 49thminute. He was joined in by his teammate Arjun, who scored a goal at 32nd minute.
G.D. Goenka Public School, Rohini beat Chinmaya Vidyalaya, Vasant Vihar 4-2 (0-0) in extra time after a goalless draw. Hartik, Devansh, Robin, Mirnil scored for G.D. Goenka Public School, Rohini whereas, Prakash and Pushkar Singh scored for Chinmaya Vidyalaya, Vasant Vihar.
Apeejay Public School, Noida outplayed Govt. School Sec-11, Rohini 4-2 after a goalless draw. Karan, Amandeep, Rishabh and Prateek scored for Apeejay Public School whereas Ansar and Ajay scored for Govt. School Sector 11.
C.R.P.F Public School, Rohini (Md. Aqib 5th, Abhishek Yadav 8th, 44th, Mukesh 48th)bt Agnel Public School, Noida 4-0
Development Aid Falls Short, While Other Financial Flows Show Rising Volatility
New Worldwatch Institute trend examines international aid flows
Washington, D.C.—-As the world approaches its 2015 deadline for achieving the Millennium Development Goals outlined in 2000, development aid by the 26 members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development declined in 2012 for the second year. Preliminary data indicate that official development assistance (ODA) totaled $128.4 billion (in 2011 dollars) that year, down 4 percent from 2011′s $133.7 billion. The 2012 figure marks a 6 percent decline from 2010, when global ODA peaked at $136.7 billion, write Worldwatch staff in the latest Vital Signs Online trend (www.worldwatch.org).
The United States provided the largest amount of ODA, with a total of $29.9 billion in 2012, which was 23.3 percent of the DAC total. Trailing the United States are the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Japan. When tracking ODA as a percentage of gross national income (GNI), however, a different picture emerges. Since 1970 the United Nations has set 0.7 percent of GNI as the target for ODA: in 2012, only Luxembourg, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark exceeded this target. In comparison, the U.S. figure was only 0.19 percent. Not surprisingly, given the severity of the Eurozone crisis, the 15 European Union members of DAC decreased their assistance by a total of 7.4 percent, with the most severe cuts coming from Spain, Italy, Greece, and Portugal.
It should be noted that DAC governments are not the only ones that provide development assistance: according to a 2012 UN report, non-DAC countries donated a total of $7.2 billion in development aid in 2010, with Saudi Arabia providing almost half of the total. Furthermore, assistance from private sources was estimated at $56 billion that same year, but reporting on such flows is much weaker than for government funds.
Humanitarian assistance, or short-term aid provided in response to disasters and humanitarian crises, is a numerically small but highly visible portion of ODA. Preliminary data indicate that in 2012 assistance provided by governments for such purposes fell 6.5 percent from the previous year, from $13.8 billion to $12.9 billion. (When including non-governmental sources, humanitarian aid fell by 7.7 percent.) This decline is not totally unexpected, as many of the world’s leading economies are still recovering from the financial crisis. Also, in 2012 the United Nations categorized 76 million people as in need of humanitarian assistance, fewer than the 93 million in 2011.
“ODA is far from the only mechanism of international capital flows to or from developing countries and emerging markets,” said Cameron Scherer, report co-author and program associate at Internews. “A multitude of vehicles—-private and public, bilateral and multilateral—-fill the global finance landscape. And against this broader canvas, ODA involves relatively small amounts of money.”
Among public funds, outflows have actually exceeded inflows into developing countries and emerging markets for most of the past decade. According to the International Monetary Fund, net outflows of more than $180 billion in 2006 turned into net inflows of close to $140 billion in 2009, but by 2012 there was once again a net outflow of close to $42 billion.
Among private flows, the largest amounts are accounted for by foreign direct investment (FDI). Net FDI rose from under $100 billion per year in the 1980s and early 1990s to a peak of $480 billion in 2008. The financial crisis then caused a dip to $335 billion in 2009, but 2011 saw a recovery to $473 billion. The bulk of FDI flowing to developing countries is going to Asia and Latin America. In East Asia and South Asia, almost 90 percent of FDI goes to China and India; in Latin America and the Caribbean, about half goes to Brazil. Only 10 percent of global FDI is destined for Africa.
“In general, FDI is more stable than other forms of private investments, especially where “greenfield” investments in new productive capacity are concerned, FDI is usually undertaken with a longer time horizon in mind, and happens mostly where macroeconomic conditions are stable,” said Michael Renner, trend co-author and Worldwatch Senior Researcher. “In contrast, portfolio investment and cross-border interbank lending are often driven by short-term considerations such as changes in interest rates.”
However, the United Nations points to evidence that a growing portion of FDI in recent years is going to investments in financial companies or to intra-company debt. Also, a considerable portion of FDI relates to mergers and acquisitions—-and thus represents a transfer of ownership rather than fresh investment. These shifts imply that capital can be moved more easily among countries, and indeed the share of short-term and more volatile financial FDI flows has increased.
Further highlights from the report:
The United States tops the list of assistance in absolute amounts, with $3.8 billion in 2012, or 29.4 percent of all humanitarian aid (a number that was $483 million below the figure in 2011). Luxembourg (at 0.16 percent of GNI) and Sweden (at 0.14 percent) top the relative standings.
In 2011, the most recent year for which data are available, Pakistan, Somalia, and the West Bank and Gaza Strip were the three areas to receive the greatest amount of humanitarian assistance, together taking in over a quarter of global assistance.
In 2002, FDI to Africa stood at just $15 billion; in 2012, it totaled $50 billion, having peaked at $59 billion in 2008. China is behind much of this FDI, providing at least $14.7 billion in 2011.
Notes to Editors:
For more information and to obtain a complimentary copy of “Development Aid Falls Short, While Other Financial Flows Show Rising Volatility,” please contact Supriya Kumar at email@example.com.
About the Worldwatch Institute:
Worldwatch is an independent research organization based in Washington, D.C. that works on energy, resource, and environmental issues. The Institute’s State of the World report is published annually in more than a dozen languages. For more information, visit www.worldwatch.org.
4th Cardiac First Aid Camp for the Police personnel of South District
Saturday, 31st August, 2013
Heart Care Foundation of India is organizing the 4th Cardiac First Aid Camp for the Police personnel of South District on Saturday, Saturday, 31st August, 2013 at 3.30pm at Sarvodaya Vidyalaya, Safdarjung Development Area.
The training will be personally given by Padma Shri & Dr. BC Roy National Awardee, Dr. KK Aggarwal, President Heart Care Foundation of India. This time the focus of the training will be on one aspect of the technique ‘push hard and push fast’. Shri BS Jaiswal, DCP South will be Chief Guest.
You are requested to depute your cameraman, reporter, photographer to cover the event.
When we called on President Barack Obama to press Russia on its antigay law, we weren’t expecting him to do so for the first time on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno.
His words were welcome, but wouldn’t it be better if he addresses the Russian people directly—on Russian TV?
The G20 Summit next week in St. Petersburg provides the perfect platform to make clear that America stands with Russia’s LGBT citizens. St. Petersburg passed one of the original local bans on gay “propaganda,” and the city is also home to prominent gay rights groups.
Our recent report, Convenient Targets: The Anti-”Propoganda” Law & the Threat to LGBT Rights in Russia, details how Russia has ramped up its crackdown on dissent, including against LGBT persons. This includes a 100-year ban on gay pride marches in Moscow, denial of registration to Sochi Pride House, hefty fines to rights groups accused of acting as a “foreign agent,” and, more recently, a federal law banning the “propaganda of nontraditional sexual relations to minors.” Against this backdrop, harassment and violent attacks on gays or those perceived as gay have become commonplace.
President Obama made LGBT rights a priority in U.S. foreign policy. Russian gay rights advocates praised President Obama’s speech in Berlin when he said, “When we stand up for our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters … we defend our own liberty as well.” But the Russian public didn’t hear about that remark because state-run media censors “propaganda of nontraditional sexual relations.” The message is clear: calling for tolerance or equality in Russia is punishable by law.
At the G20 Summit, the President must continue to stand for equality and make clear to the Russian people that gay rights are human rights.
2nd YES BANK-GIZ-UNEP FISustainability Series, in association with the IICA–GIZ Business Responsibility Initiative, is being organized in Mumbai, on 25September 2013. The objective of the second workshop is to create awareness on Sustainable Finance and Development, in the overall context of responsible business, focusing on the role of media and civil society.
The YES BANK-GIZ-UNEP FI Sustainability Series was launched by Dr. K. C. Chakrabarty, Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India, with the intent to mainstream sustainable finance in Indian financial institutions, in April 2013. This workshop, specifically, aims to provide a tailored approach for media and NGO professionals, who deal with financial markets, sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and environment. This workshop would aim to equip the participants with hands-on knowledge on sustainable finance (including the emerging concepts and practices of Responsible Investment and Lending), and to provide the basis for advanced knowledge in this space.
Enclosed are the invitation letter and the agenda. Kindly log on to https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/8XYX2C9 to register your name. We eagerly look forward to your participation and hope to see you at the workshop!
CSE has just published a food recipe book. It celebrates the connection between biodiversity and culture of food. We believe if we lose the knowledge and culture of our local cuisine then we lose more than just the taste and smell, we lose nature.
We want to celebrate this knowledge and to build a culture of food that recognises nature and nutrition. To do this, we are launching the book, in collaboration with India Habitat Centre.
We hope you will join us for the launch, the live food demonstration by master chef Manish Mehrotra and dinner, all made from recipes in the book.
Please drop a line to confirm that you would be joining us.
Regards Sunita Narain, Vibha Varshney and the CSE team